We welcome constructive comments from scientists, statisticians, scientific bodies, Universities, citizen scientists and members of the general public.

We have been careful to present our research in such a way to be devoid of personal rancour, vilification, character assassination, ridicule, emotional manipulation, conspiracy theories and other non-scientific ways of communicating.

To this end we have presented our information as objectively and impartially as possible and giving full blocks of the data from which we have worked. For some this may make parts of the site tedious and hard to work through but we make no apologies for this. We want it all to be based strictly on observation, sound and rigorously tested data, robust statistical methods and sound deductive reasoning. We have avoided the use of ‘click bait’ and other emotive tools commonly used in media reports, political speeches, social media and other communication avenues such as advertising and drama presentations on stage, film, television as well as in art and magazines.

If you wish to make comments or suggestions we ask you to make them in the same spirit with which we have published this research.Please support your comments or suggestions with detailed and reasoned argument and using sound data. Please be specific about which of our papers to which you refer. Thanks in anticipation.

Your feedback can be made by adding comments to the pages of each paper presented here. Comments of this type will be moderated prior to publishing. Or, if you have detailed analysis please send these by email to:

Scientist and chief researcher, Dr. Bill Johnston at Scientist@Bomwatch.com.au

Publisher/Editor, David Mason-Jones at Publisher@Bomwatch.com.au